Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maxime Chazal vs Matteo Viola Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chazal vs Viola analysis and find out who is favored!
Maxime Chazal vs Matteo Viola Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chazal 1 - 1 Viola
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chazal has won 48.01% of points on their second serve, while Viola has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chazal, in recent form, has won 53.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Viola has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.53% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chazal has saved 62.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Viola has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chazal has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Viola winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chazal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 417/ 243), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Viola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 119/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Chazal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13), where as Viola has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chazal winning 1 times and Viola being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Chazal winning 3 and Viola winning 1. The last match between Chazal and Viola was at the Italy F25, 18-08-2016, Quarterfinals, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 2-6 7-5 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chazal and Viola have played a deciding set 2 times, with Chazal winning 1 times and Viola 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chazal winning 1, and Viola 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chazal has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.53 while Viola has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chazal has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Viola has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chazal has converted 46.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Viola has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
507
Rank
234
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
831
Rank
118
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
61% (453-294)
Career Total W/L
53% (563-490)
63% (19-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,860
Career Prize Money
$206,441
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maxime Chazal | Matteo Viola |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 23 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:28 | 2:14:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (103/162) | 68% (113/166) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (57/103) | 58% (65/113) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (28/59) | 40% (21/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (9/25) | 45% (9/20) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (80/166) | 48% (77/162) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-5 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Matteo Viola
66%
(
80 of
122)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
120)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
61 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
120
Total Points Won
122
|
||||
| 4-6 1-1 ret. |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Maxime Chazal
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
41
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maxime Chazal | Matteo Viola |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (19/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (42/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (345/306) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (19/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 45 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 191.83 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1348/2100) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (914/1348) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (361/752) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (102/220) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (877/2064) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (19/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (19/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Federico Gaio
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Damien Wenger
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Franco Roncadelli
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Simon Beaupain
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
79%
(
54 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Viktor Durasovic
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Maxime Chazal
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Theo Papamalamis
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Arthur Reymond
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Simon Beaupain
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chazal Vs Viola Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chazal are available here and Viola photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maxime Chazal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
